28 results for “corporate limits”
28 results for “corporate limits”
The Syracuse Common Council held a regular meeting on July 24, 2023, addressing multiple items including a local law to grant permanent easements to Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Verizon New York for electric and telecommunication services at Shea Middle School and Bellevue Elementary School for $1.00. New business items included approving various commissioner appointments, authorizing agreements for youth recreation programs with costs up to $250 and $400 respectively, and endorsing a Downtown Committee grant application of up to $500,000 to the New York State Environmental Protection Fund for downtown infrastructure and recreation improvements. Additional matters covered a proposed local law amendment to increase income eligibility limits for property tax exemptions for persons with disabilities and corrections to tax assessment rolls for several properties.
AI summary
Ordinance 5693 extends the corporate limits of the City of Mesa, Arizona by annexing contiguous territory into the city. The City of Mesa filed a blank petition with the Maricopa County Recorder on January 3, 2022, and held a public hearing on January 24, 2022, in compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-471. A written petition signed by property owners representing one-half or more in value and more than one-half of the persons owning property subject to taxation within the annexation area was subsequently filed with the County Recorder within one year of the thirty-day waiting period. The annexation satisfies statutory requirements and does not alter territory previously claimed in another filing.
AI summary
Ordinance No. 5652 extends the corporate limits of the City of Mesa, Arizona by annexing contiguous territory pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Title 9, Chapter 4, Article 7. The City filed a blank petition with the Maricopa County Recorder on October 6, 2021, followed by a public hearing on November 1, 2021. A written petition signed by owners of at least one-half in value of real and personal property subject to taxation within the proposed annexation area was filed with the County Recorder within one year of the required thirty-day waiting period. The Mayor and Council approved extending Mesa's corporate limits to embrace the described territory, which satisfied all statutory requirements under A.R.S. Section 9-471(H) and contained no alterations after petition signature.
AI summary
Norfolk County, Virginia operates as an independent city and maintains public records under Virginia's Freedom of Information Act (§ 2.2-3700 et seq.), with all records defined as writings, papers, maps, photographs, and other documentary materials prepared or retained by public bodies in conducting public business. The city adheres to Virginia's open records framework, requiring all public bodies to respond to records requests within five working days of receipt under § 2.2-3704. Public records available include court filings (maintained by Norfolk Circuit Court Clerk and General District Court serving the 4th Judicial District), property records (deeds, mortgages, assessments via the Circuit Court Clerk and City Assessor), vital records (managed by Virginia Department of Health and Circuit Court Clerk), business licenses and permits (held by Commissioner of the Revenue and State Corporation Commission), tax records (maintained by City Treasurer and Commissioner of the Revenue), election data (Norfolk City Registrar), meeting minutes and agendas (City Clerk), budgets and audits (Department of Finance), law enforcement records (Police Department), and zoning permits (Department of Planning and Community Development). Public bodies must provide access during regular office hours without requiring requesters to state a reason for seeking records, except in limited circumstances.
AI summary
The Syracuse Economic Development Corporation Board of Directors met on April 6, 2023, with five of eleven board members present; noting a lack of quorum, the group agreed to discuss agenda items and report findings to the full board for email voting. The meeting covered the FY 2022 audit overview and review of multiple loan requests under the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding programs, including a $5,000 request from All Money Spends and a $25,000 request from Finessin' Barber Lounge, which the board countered with a $5,000 micro-enterprise loan offer based on SEDCO lending guidelines limiting borrowing to previous year revenues. The agenda also included discussion of ARPA Community Impact Fund requests, including one from Whiskey Coop seeking $185,000.
AI summary
This ordinance from the City of Houston proposes to enlarge the boundaries of Reinvestment Zone Number Three (Main Street/Market Square Zone), which was originally created in 1995 and previously enlarged in 1998 and 2005. The City Council finds that the additional contiguous area meets state requirements for reinvestment zone expansion under Texas Tax Code Chapter 311, as it is located within Houston's corporate limits, contains substandard and deteriorating structures that impair sound growth, and represents less than 10 percent residential property. The expansion complies with state limitations, as the total appraised value of the enlarged zone does not exceed 15 percent of the city's total taxable real property value or that of Harris County and the Houston Independent School District.
AI summary
Ordinance 5602 authorizes the annexation of specified territory into the City of Mesa, Arizona, pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Title 9, Chapter 4, Article 7. The City filed a blank petition with the Maricopa County Recorder on December 17, 2020, describing the territory and exterior boundaries to be annexed, with notice provided to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and Assessor. A public hearing was held on January 11, 2021, and a written petition signed by owners of more than one-half in value of real and personal property subject to taxation was filed and circulated within one year of the 30-day waiting period. The territory is completely surrounded by existing City of Mesa corporate limits and is not currently within the city's boundaries.
AI summary
City of Mesa Ordinance 5655 approves the annexation of contiguous territory into the City of Mesa pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Title 9, Chapter 4, Article 7. The blank petition for annexation was filed with the Maricopa County Recorder on October 21, 2021, with notice provided to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and Assessor. A public hearing was held on November 15, 2021, as required by statute. The written petition was signed by owners of at least one-half in value of real and personal property and more than one-half of persons owning property subject to City taxation within the proposed annexation territory, and was filed within one year of the thirty-day waiting period. The ordinance authorizes extending the City's corporate limits to embrace the described territory.
AI summary
The Wilmington City Council's Public Works & Transportation Committee held a meeting on November 19, 2018, to address street infrastructure changes requested by the Riverfront Development Corporation. The primary agenda items included approving the removal of a portion of Garasches Lane from the Official City Map while accepting dedication of a new unnamed city street connecting South Walnut Street and Garasches Lane, and declaring the removed portion of Garasches Lane as surplus property for disposition to the Riverfront Development Corporation. The meeting also included discussion of amendments to city code regarding wireless telecommunications facilities in public rights of way and a presentation on solar technology by Sun Edge LLC, with public comment limited to three minutes per agenda item.
AI summary
City of Mesa Ordinance 5724 extends the city's corporate limits by annexing territory that meets statutory requirements under Arizona Revised Statutes Title 9, Chapter 4, Article 7. A blank petition was filed with the Maricopa County Recorder on June 14, 2022, followed by a public hearing on July 11, 2022. The territory proposed for annexation is surrounded by the City of Mesa's existing corporate limits on at least three sides and is not currently within city limits. The petition was signed by owners of at least one-half the value of real and personal property and more than one-half of persons owning property that would be subject to city taxation upon annexation, filed within one year of the required 30-day waiting period.
AI summary
Des Moines County, Iowa's Zoning Ordinance No. 34 governs land use in the unincorporated area within two miles of Burlington's corporate limits. Originally adopted in 1998, the ordinance was comprehensively revised on February 22, 2022, and most recently amended on July 30, 2024. The document establishes zoning districts, definitions, regulations for permitted uses (including agricultural, conservation, and accessory uses), and building standards, with the "A-1" Agricultural District among the primary zoning classifications.
AI summary
Ordinance No. 1, introduced November 20, 2023, annexes a tract of land into the City of Lincoln, Nebraska. The annexation encompasses portions of Lot 57 I.T., Lot 68 I.T., and South Folsom Street right-of-way located in the Southwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 9 North, Range 6 East, Lancaster County, Nebraska, containing 243,370.20 square feet or 5.59 acres. The ordinance amends the Corporate Limits Map previously established by Ordinance No. 18208 to reflect the extended corporate limits boundary. The annexation was assigned Annexation No. 22014.
AI summary
This document is a Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation annual report form (Form 1) for business entities to file by April 15th. The form requires all business entities to provide basic information including business name, mailing address, Department ID number, Federal Employer Identification Number, state and date of incorporation or formation, and nature of business. Corporate entities must additionally list officers (President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer) and directors. The form establishes filing fees by business type, ranging from $0 for domestic and foreign non-stock corporations and foreign interstate corporations to $300 for most other entity types including domestic and foreign stock corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnerships, and statutory trusts, with a reduced $100 fee for SDAT Certified Family Farms.
AI summary